Спасибо, мне примечание в конце понравилось

Several years later, in 1966, Nobel laureate in economics Gunnar Myrdal made an observation about suicides and the interpretation of the suicide rate statistics [11]:

This statistic is affected by a heavy bias which raised the apparent Swedish rate in comparison with all, or almost all, other countries. In England, for example, suicide is still a crime. In most countries, particularly the Catholic ones, it is a grave sin against the Creator. In secularized Sweden, it is not a crime and not a sin, though a regrettable deviation from normal behavior. When committed with a sane mind it is gradually becoming viewed, however, as almost a human right and a civil liberty. In any case, it is strictly a personal and family matter. Among the absolute taboos in Swedish journalism, which no newspaperman would think of transgressing, is the rule never to give publicity to suicides or divorces -- they are assumed to belong to an intimate sphere from which outsiders should keep away. Thus, there is much less temptation in Sweden than other countries for relatives to press for a verdict of accidental death when a man falls from a window or a woman takes too large a dose of sleeping pills.

Дело даже не в этом. Настоящий (или пусть даже выдуманный) упрёк был в том, что "справедливое" устройство общества на количество самоубийц не влияет кардинально, на что целый нобелевский лауреат придумал только "сами такие, и вообще вы свою статистику подкручиваете в угоду общественному мнению"